{"id":14259,"date":"2013-02-06T10:00:30","date_gmt":"2013-02-06T15:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pmedicine.org\/epatients\/?p=14259"},"modified":"2013-02-05T17:22:22","modified_gmt":"2013-02-05T22:22:22","slug":"closed-systems-collapse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/participatorymedicine.org\/epatients\/2013\/02\/closed-systems-collapse.html","title":{"rendered":"Closed systems collapse, open ones thrive: the Health Design Challenge"},"content":{"rendered":"

Next guest post by SPM member and\u00a0former health system executive<\/em>\u00a0@NickDawson<\/a>.<\/i><\/em><\/p>\n

Ilya Prigogine received in the Nobel Prize in Chemistry<\/a> in 1977. His work largely focused on Non-equilibrium thermodynamics<\/a>. What he found is as fascinating for scientists and non-scientists alike. It turns out, according to Prigogine, closed systems are destined to collapse or fail. Open systems, by contrast, will usually grow and evolve[1][2].<\/p>\n

Healthcare is notorious for its closed systems. We see painful reminders in restrictions on accessing our own health data. And it goes deeper. The processes, experiences and governance of health systems has also been, historically, closed. Today, healthcare represents a huge 18%<\/a> of our gross domestic product. And, according to the WHO<\/a>, the United States is 37th in the world in terms of outcomes.<\/p>\n

It would seem Prigogine is correct. Closed systems tend to fail. Thankfully, that is changing.<\/p>\n

In 2012, a consortium called d*collab put forth a challenge: design a better health record. The challenge had 4 objectives:<\/p>\n

\n