{"id":14985,"date":"2013-07-13T09:00:30","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T13:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pmedicine.org\/epatients\/?p=14985"},"modified":"2013-07-13T09:21:48","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T13:21:48","slug":"crowd-trumps-credentials-medpedias-dead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/participatorymedicine.org\/epatients\/2013\/07\/crowd-trumps-credentials-medpedias-dead.html","title":{"rendered":"Crowd trumps credentials: Medpedia’s dead."},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>In medicine, to achieve the best you need the best information. So an essential question is, who gets to say<\/em> what’s best?<\/p>\n That question took a sharp turn this week with the news that Medpedia is dead.<\/p>\n Medical librarian Laika Spoetnik has a strong post on the demise, including an interview with its founder, James Currier:\u00a0Medpedia, the Medical Wikipedia, is Dead. And we Missed its\u00a0Funeral<\/a>.\u00a0 The bottom line is:<\/p>\n It’s another nail in the coffin of the outdated idea that authority with massive credentials – and investor money – will give you better information than a mob with no investors, governed only by community rules.\u00a0Read Laika’s post for several analyses back then; here’s the short version of the concept as I saw it: … when I saw their home page it literally took my breath away: there are invitations for doctors to join, and organizations to contribute content, but\u00a0nothing for patients \u2013 we can contribute ideas, not content.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n A crowdsourced medical encyclopedia was fine in concept, but its implementation was unaware that reality has changed. (Ferguson saw it; their investors didn’t.) So among other things, Wikipedia – an uncredentialed, leaderless crowd – has often outperformed Medpedia, whose reliance on credentials was its entire\u00a0raison d’\u00eatre<\/i>: if the premise fails, the enterprise flops. So it goes.<\/p>\n The problem was predicted by our Feb 2009 post\u00a0Who gets to say what info is reliable?<\/a>\u00a0which drew 70 comments. The post asked, “Who will vet the vetters?” Comments included this, from SPM founder John Grohol:<\/p>\n … If you start with a closed, walled-off garden to begin with in terms of contributors, you\u2019re already starting at a disadvantage.<\/p>\n Wikipedia showed that shared knowledge can work … but it takes the devotion of thousands of dedicated, altruistic people. Medpedia, although perhaps well-intentioned, is coming at health and medical knowledge from a distinctly 1.0 \u201cdocs know best\u201d philosophy.<\/p>\n It\u2019s fascinating to see that old-school philosophy be grafted on to a 2.0 tool and business model, in hopes of generating something new and different. I have my doubts, reading through the tripe listed currently for mental disorders (full of misinformation).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Laika’s post links to numerous comments by sharp observers, including internet mega-maven Clay Shirky<\/a>, and ScienceRoll doc @berci, who said back<\/a> then:<\/p>\n I believe elitism kills content.<\/strong>\u00a0Only the power of masses controlled by well-designed editing guidelines can lead to a comprehensive encyclopaedia.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The very first medical conference I ever attended was Connected Health, October 2008, where Shirky said in a keynote:<\/p>\n The patients on ACOR don’t need our help, and they don’t need our permission.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n Here’s to the visionaries – the people who understand what’s going on, below the surface, and can see the future, so we can build on it.<\/p>\n I encourage you to read Laika’s post<\/a>, including all the links. She’s\u00a0@LaikaS<\/a>\u00a0on Twitter.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In medicine, to achieve the best you need the best information. So an essential question is, who gets to say what’s best? That question took a sharp turn this week with the news that Medpedia is dead. Medical librarian Laika Spoetnik has a strong post on the demise, including an interview with its founder, James […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[21],"tags":[72,6830,1274,6806,3433,6412,6841,6822,6838,856,6842,2420,6831,6827,6826,5289,1260,540,6843,6836,857,1413,6834,50],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-14985","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-e-ptsresources","tag-blog","tag-cancer-case","tag-clinicians","tag-credentials","tag-crowd","tag-demise","tag-investor-money","tag-invitations","tag-james-currier","tag-kidney-cancer","tag-medical-encyclopedia","tag-medical-librarian","tag-medical-websites","tag-mob","tag-nail-in-the-coffin","tag-observers","tag-patient-communities","tag-patient-community","tag-premise","tag-sharp-turn","tag-tom-ferguson","tag-trumps","tag-vetters","tag-wikipedia"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe crowd trumps credentials.<\/h2>\n
\n<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n