Engaging patients differs depending on the role. Those on national Boards lead, strategize, advocate, communicate. Adam Thompson is on the Board of NQF. Listen in.<\/p>\n
As a nurse, I studied individual health. Then I became a student of organizational health. That led me to management and leadership \u2013 all with the mind to get stuff done. Done for people, with people, by people -patients, caregivers, and direct care clinicians. My role changed at each step. My bag of tools grew. I learned to be a good leader, coach, and mentor. Sometimes great. Sometimes I reached my goal when I had one\u2014my success measure: Bat .500 \u2013 Success half the time. Now I\u2019m old, nearing the end of my career, and I\u2019m on a national board, the Board of Governors of PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute)<\/a>. As a life-long learner and master networker, I started looking for other people Identifying as patient-caregiver stakeholders on national boards. I found our guest, Adam Thompson, recently. He\u2019s on the board of the National Quality Forum (NQF)<\/a>. I\u2019m a member of NQF and serve on several committees and panels. Matt Pickering, a Director at NQF, appeared on Health Hats, the Podcast a few months ago. NQF\u2019s Mission<\/strong>: To be the trusted voice driving measurable health improvements. Its Vision:<\/strong>\u00a0Every person experiences high-value care and optimal health outcomes. There\u2019s way more to it than that. Let\u2019s meet Adam and learn more.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> Good morning. How are you?<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> So glad it\u2019s Friday. This was finals week for graduate school, and the first half of our thesis was due. It\u2019s all the sort of widgets and planning pieces, which is you change one thing in a document, and then there are seven other documents you got to go change it in. So, it was just like, oh my God, all week.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> What is your role, and where are you in this?<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> So, I am just about to finish my master\u2019s in public health. I started just before the pandemic. It was not the worst time to get a master\u2019s degree. I will say that.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> I got my MPH at the University of Minnesota\u2019s ISP Program<\/a>. And it was one of the first distance learning programs. The whole philosophy was that you had to be in the industry and use your work as your laboratory.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> Yup. Ours was very similar.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> And it was an excellent education.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> Have you ever met or come across Dr. David Nash<\/a> in your work?<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> It\u2019s a familiar name, but I can\u2019t say how.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> He\u2019s one of the crown princes of population health management. He does a lot of work there. He founded a school of population health out of the Jefferson Health Enterprise in Philadelphia. I went to school because I thought, Ooh, population health. That\u2019s cool. And it was run by the lead qualitative researcher. So that made it even cooler.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> Okay. What I wanted to chew on with you is this business of being a patient caregiver activist and being on a national board. So, I\u2019m on the board of governors of PCORI (Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute and you\u2019re on the board of<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> the National Quality Forum,<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> The National Quality Forum. First, it\u2019s a hoot to have that seat, and to be in a leadership role is different than being an activist. Not that one doesn\u2019t inform the other. But it\u2019s a different role. At least for me, I feel like my responsibility is to the whole organization. And so, I feel like I had to hone my listening skills throughout my career. Because I would have to say that it is not my strongest muscle. I feel like it\u2019s even -it\u2019s on steroids. The making all the connections, listening to other board members who I\u2019m so fortunate that the board of PCORI is brilliant, just brilliant, and inspiring. And I have so much to learn, and I love learning. But it means shut mouth, open ears. Anyway, tell me a bit about your experience?<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> I absolutely agree that coming from the community of people with HIV, we are very rooted in our agitation, activism, and advocacy. And as a community, adept at understanding where you deploy what method? What are you doing in this environment? And in our community, we\u2019ve thought about it in a framework where agitation is when someone disagrees with you. There\u2019s not a problem. They don\u2019t want to do anything about it. Activism, people are aware there\u2019s a problem. They\u2019re just not motivated to do something. And advocacy is, we\u2019ve all agreed that there\u2019s a problem. And we want to do something about it collectively. As I\u2019ve worked through my community before, joining what I would call the culture of quality right here in the United States. I learned how to recognize when a system is listening. How to hear, right, when people listen to you. And I think, as a result, I feel a great responsibility. I feel like my business is the human condition. At its core, what I try to do is, see experience and understanding. Find a way to translate it and then an appropriate frame for the environment in the context we\u2019re trying to inform with that experience. And so, for me, I agree with you, right? It\u2019s like I had to listen a lot. When I first started doing quality measurement work, I remember the summer was learning statistics. And I was like, oh my goodness. I called physicians. And even they were like, Adam, I don\u2019t do this. You have to talk to somebody else. And I learned. I listened. And I think if there\u2019s any wisdom that I\u2019ve gained from it, I\u2019m not sitting at those tables at NQF because I\u2019m an accomplished clinician. I\u2019m not sitting there because I have developed a groundbreaking measure to solve all our disparities. I think I\u2019m there because I have found a way to be a conduit for my community\u2019s experience and understanding and how to bring that back to the community. I think what I\u2019ve learned is that I look for opportunities in my experience, both sitting on various committees and expert panels but also as a board member, to find the moments where that experience, that narrative, that collective sort of like voices of the people that come from the spaces and places that I walk in and the people that I hang out with walk in. And try to find the moment when it\u2019s mostly going to inform that opportunity. I\u2019ll be the first to say, I don\u2019t always have something to say about everything, but I think, and I would hope that my colleagues might agree with me, that when I do say something, I think it\u2019s meaningful because it\u2019s that as you were saying, I\u2019ve listened. I\u2019ve learned what they value and how they speak about things. And so, as a board member, I feel an incredible responsibility, as the framer of experience, and I think then you have the responsibility to maintain an authentic connection to people, right? So that I\u2019m not framing myself. According to some, I may be a handsome fellow, but most folks don\u2019t want you to represent your interests at a national table. They want to feel that their experience has been integrated and incorporated and has been, I think, thoughtfully injected into the conversation at the point when it\u2019s going to have the most value.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> Yeah, I guess I would think that for me. I always have a lot to say. I feel like my challenge is that I prepare for every meeting. Some of the preparation is reading the material and thinking about the material. What are my reactions? What is essential in this? And w but I would say that. I\u2019m making up the numbers. But I would say a third of my effort of preparation is to narrow down to two points that I\u2019m going to advocate for, or I\u2019m going to ask two questions or two things. Yeah, because my brain goes a mile a minute, and it\u2019s too much. It\u2019s too much for me, let alone my colleagues around the table. So, I\u2019ve been in this role for a year and a half, and it was clear to me that my first job was building trust. I belong at this table because I\u2019m somebody that people can count on that I listen to and participate. That I show up that I, yeah, that I do the work. I do the back-room stuff. I\u2019m supportive because, without that, the rest of it is, like, who cares. But how do you like the thing that I\u2019m thinking about is, as you\u2019re describing, I think that the personal mission juxtaposed to the organizational mission. Now I would never have sought nor accepted a board position or the kind of contributions that I\u2019ve given to PCORI over the 12 years I\u2019ve been involved with it if there wasn\u2019t a huge amount of synergy and if I didn\u2019t respect the organization and the leadership and the staff like why. It\u2019s, so that\u2019s a given. But is some of what you\u2019ve been saying that how you try to marry those two or blend those or whatever.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> Yeah. I think we just don\u2019t have 48 hours in a day. We have 24 hours. That\u2019s all we get. And if we\u2019re lucky, maybe we get eight hours of sleep as part of it. And unfortunately, I think, here, particularly in the United States, patient advocates sitting at these national tables like they don\u2019t grow on trees is the perception, right? There are a lot of spaces and places people want us to do work. And there\u2019s a lot of spaces and places where we want to do work. And so, I try to find the places that I think will be the most meaningful, and as a person with HIV, again, I keep mentioning that it\u2019s such a strong influence from our community. We learned a long time ago that engagement with our government and how society was structured would be the path. That we needed to understand how the FDA approved our medications. We needed to understand how the healthcare delivery system was designed to integrate our feedback into the program\u2019s quality. When I come out of the Ryan White program<\/a> as a patient, I think that\u2019s how all of health. That like everybody got these sorts of comprehensive<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> sorry. Say a bit of the Ryan White program.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> Oh yeah. The Ryan White program is a federal program. It\u2019s funded through the president\u2019s discretionary budget. Funds a comprehensive care system for persons with HIV in the United States. And it is mandated legislatively to have a clinical quality management program. And that program has to identify indicators and conduct an annual quality improvement project.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> Thank you.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> For me going through the Ryan White system, I saw what we could do if a community understood this pathway to agency. And it was like, here was this group of people saying we\u2019re into quality and we need patients and caregivers and family, and all the community to help us do this. And I was like, this is great. And so, once I got deeply involved in that, I started becoming aware that this little community of quality we had was part of a national community and an international community. And so suddenly, what I thought were just assumptions of how things work. It\u2019s like the curtain got pulled back and suddenly you see, whoa, look at what\u2019s happening. Look at the thought, the attention to detail. I had no idea. The smartest people in the country sit around and think about us. Like that was inspiring, and it was even cooler to know and think that they wanted us to be a part of it. But I think then when I learned about places like the National Quality Forum, the people who are helping to shape and frame this conversation and to shine their light as part of their role. A place like that could inspire measurement. I learned a long time ago in our Ryan White program that what we measure gets improved, that we can inform measurement, that we can be a part of developing it, implementing it, and evaluating it. And so, as a person, I\u2019m white, I\u2019m cisgender, I\u2019m a male. I\u2019ve got like all the privileges. I see it. I\u2019ve been given access to it. I don\u2019t doubt that a lot of that access is because I look, act, and sound a lot like the people who already have that access. And so, I look for organizations where access is present, but when you look at the organization, that access is part of their culture. And when I first engaged, I\u2019ll speak about National Quality Forum. That\u2019s the sort of board. I was on a committee, actively asked what I thought. I ended up making a comment that changed a measure. Oops. The patient knew more about scientific reliability than the committee did. And so, it was just. It was a great experience where I was both. The experience was sought. I was allowed to share, and I saw an immediate impact. And I said I am one person. These are dozens of tables. There are so many spaces and places. My community needs to know about this. And that\u2019s when I think I started understanding that the synergy I believe you are describing is about not just an individual like I\u2019m responsible to the people I sit at that table for. And so, the synergy that exists has not just to be, I think, synergy for me, but synergy for the people that I\u2019m supposed to be sitting at that table to represent. And if I\u2019m not doing that or the organization isn\u2019t open to that or doesn\u2019t reflect in their culture, this is even like a possible space that we\u2019re working in. Then I just don\u2019t know, as a patient, a person with HIV, a former drug user, a former sex worker. Like, I just don\u2019t know if I have that fight in me to try to turn an organization that isn\u2019t thinking that way. I go to the spaces and places where I think people inspire me. And every time I talk to our national quality leaders, whether from NQF, IHI or even in our measure development community, these are smart people. But not only are they smart, but they\u2019re also compassionate. They\u2019re passionate about what they do. And yeah. Just a little bit wonky. They just don\u2019t know how to ask for friends. And so, part of what I try to do is just broker that friendship and say, you want to talk to people. I talk to people, so let\u2019s make this happen. And when that can occur, when I can create access so that it\u2019s not just generating a better service or greater access in a health system, but access to the design of that system and the thinking about its purpose and structure. To me, that\u2019s what sort of deconstructing sort of power and privilege is all about, expanding access to it. And I think as a patient on a national board, that\u2019s part of what we\u2019ve got to do, is open those doors for other people.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> That\u2019s eloquent. I\u2019m trying to think of how to frame this question. So, I resonate with the. If I\u2019m going to put all this effort out, it needs also to feed me. Meaning that, like I just got, I couldn\u2019t make a meeting, and I just listened to the recording of the session that I couldn\u2019t make. And oh, my goodness. I was so inspired. I wish I had been there. I wish I could put my 2 cents worth in because I can\u2019t help myself, but it was inspiring and okay that I wasn\u2019t there. The issues were solid. As you said, compassion is the drive to go from theory to action. Then, it was all there. So, one of the things that I did when I got appointed to this board was engaged a coach because I feel like this is a career capper for me. I mean, I\u2019m old, and then I\u2019m quote-unquote retired, and I put a lot of time into this, which is as big as I\u2019m going to get. I want to do a good job, and I want to take care of myself. I don\u2019t want to burn myself out. I want to contribute. Through having a coach, I realized that the first thing to do was build trust that limits me to two points. It\u2019s hard to see your wake. I know I\u2019m a force. I\u2019m a charismatic, eloquent-driven person. And so, just anything, you can\u2019t be in healthcare and not think about unintended consequences. And so, I feel like that\u2019s a danger of being me is my own, the unintended consequences that I have and want to be effective in this role. So hence having a coach has helped me. Yeah. What kind of support do you get from the organization, NQF, or your community? Like, how do you deal with it? This is a different stage.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> Yeah. Yeah. There is in our community. We have this growing. I\u2019m not going to say it\u2019s a problem. It\u2019s like a challenge. And it has to do with so many of us now who have become part of systems that through efforts to make systems more representative, more culturally responsive. We\u2019re finding our way into these organizations. Yeah. That kind of engagement and I find working with systems, being a part of like public-serving boards, you\u2019re very similar in a lot of these different environments, and it changes a little bit that you didn\u2019t see before sometimes for the better sometimes not. Sometimes, you are less guarded when you\u2019re in those environments. And so the words that come out could sting a little more. That part of the wisdom is to be like, my moment is we can help in this space, and not I don\u2019t want to get into like the whole cancel culture thing, but there are compassionate things we can do to bring others into a better state of awareness. All these things, right? I was terrified when I was a kid joining some of these tables, especially the first kind of national tables I joined. I didn\u2019t know what was supposed to happen there. Someone uses a word that I don\u2019t know. Does that mean I don\u2019t join the conversation? Does that mean I just, do I Google it quickly and try to learn enough about it so that I say something smart? It was like. There are questions about how I like what you\u2019re saying, build trust, demonstrate to the committee or the table that I deserve to be there, and be valuable. And I think a lot of those questions. I look to the elders in my community, the people who had sat at these tables before me. One woman, Dolores Dockrey,<\/a> passed away right at the very beginning of the COVID epidemic. She was a black woman who started as an undocumented immigrant and came to the US to get her master\u2019s. Ended up. She just was a force, and her nickname was The Quiet Storm, and she was like this little old Jamaican lady who would just sit in her meetings and be very quiet and just say nothing. And then, when it got to her, the things that she said would just. I won\u2019t say explode a room. It lit up a room, right? It\u2019s like she had quietly observed and listened and figured out what she was going to say that would turn the room to the benefit of her constituents. She was just so good at it. And I remember asking her before I sat at this first, it was a federal policy meeting for HIV, and she could not go. She said, hey, Adam, I\u2019m going to send you. Talk to me about this environment. And she said it\u2019s a policy table. You will not get many opportunities to speak. You will likely be able to say one or two things, so you better make it count. And I was like, okay. So now suddenly here\u2019s this like responsibility and the pressure. And when I got in the meeting, I spoke more than twice. I had a lot to say, but it was like, I was disruptive and people. Oh, and I think that coin on that edge could have flipped right to we hate this kid. Don\u2019t ever let him come back here. Thankfully it flipped on the other side, which was, wow, he has a lot of passion. We should listen more, but that room doesn\u2019t always go that way. And I learned very quickly that before I walk into a room, I first talk to the people in my community to find out, have you ever walked into this room? Do we know that this is a place and a space for us? Have we been respected here? Have we been disrespected here? And if, if my community looks back and is we never heard of it, then you start asking around. And try to understand. But I think I learned because people were willing to teach, and I was willing to ask, and I think there\u2019s a humility in that leadership point to say, Yeah, I\u2019m sitting on this national board, and I will still to this day, right? When I get the measures, and I got to review them and read them, I talk to people who are specialists in that field. I want to understand their perspective. I go to the people in my community, particularly black women and indigenous folks. like all the people whose narratives will give me a different facet on this. And then I come in. I think the wisdom that I get is when I hear something from the community that is so loud. Then I have to make that decision about whether I put this here as loud as it is as I\u2019m hearing it right. And that I think I go, and I ask people in the community and say, should we be shouting this? Or is this something that we put on the table and let it go, or do I need to ring the bell, and I\u2019ve had, I\u2019m not going to lie? I\u2019ve rang bells at a national level before when the community says ring it. But I would never do that. I don\u2019t think I would ever do it on my own. I think that ringing a bell by yourself without the wisdom of people around you. It can be like you\u2019re saying there are unintended consequences of ringing a bell for a community that maybe isn\u2019t ready to have that out.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> That\u2019s so interesting. A couple of things: I\u2019m impressed with the internal so in PCORI, so other board members, the executive director, and some of the senior staff. Since I\u2019ve been part of PCORI for more than ten years, I feel like I have a network within PCORI and part of my educating myself includes them. And which is, and then there are these advisory panels. And so, I\u2019ve been involved with advisory panels, and I try to attend as many as I can just to keep my ear to the ground. Oh, and a couple of other things. One is I find that for me just since I built trust. I feel like instead of shouting, I can say the community is shouting. And just say, the community is shouting, and that\u2019s enough. And, of course, I see that things that I bring up are incorporated into the organizational work makes me feel comfortable that I don\u2019t need to shout for real. I say this is important, and that\u2019s enough.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> And I think that is, to go back to the beginning of our conversation. I think that\u2019s the distinction between activism and advocacy, right? If I have to shout, folks aren\u2019t with me yet. Because I should be able just to say, The people in my community are suffering. Here is why, in the context of measurement, it doesn\u2019t account for people with this condition, or it doesn\u2019t think about persons with this experience. And when you say that in a room, I think especially at a national level and especially in healthcare, and maybe I\u2019ve got privileged, rosy glasses on. I think most people I\u2019ve engaged with, at least, I never know what\u2019s in their head, but I think they hear that, and they go, wow. Okay. So we should do something about that. And it\u2019s taken and accepted with the same credibility and authority as if the clinician had said this is clinically unsafe. And that, like that trust you\u2019re talking about there. I think it is built, and it\u2019s something that puts the mentoring in the other direction. I\u2019ve got people I keep trying to bring into the world, and okay, come over here. I need you in this space. They need to hear what you have to say. But the critical, I would almost call it a critical conversation, is how this is categorically different from anything that you\u2019ve done before, including board service at a community-based organization. The stakes are higher. The conversation is more technical and specific, and your impact is enormous. And so you have to understand, I think all of those components. Because, as you said earlier, we can\u2019t see our wake, and sometimes you can throw a boulder in a pothole puddle. You just obliterate the entire environment when you could have just looked down, and hey folks, let\u2019s look here, not kind of fire rockets at the situation. And I think that is maturity somewhat in how communities can engage as power and privilege expand. Some folks will look back and say, I scream because they\u2019ve never listened. And I think that\u2019s when a system. If we\u2019re trauma-informed, right? If we are genuinely adopting those principles, then when we reach out, sometimes I think our boards and our systems need to learn how to hear the screaming a little bit at first and understand that\u2019s been because we\u2019re conditioned to do that as patients in healthcare. So, all that context is what I try, from my experience, to share with the people before I put them in a room because it\u2019s different.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> I\u2019m chewing on this, a distinction between activists and advocates. I feel like, at PCORI, I am not like there\u2019s. I have almost zero work. Everybody\u2019s drunk the Kool-Aid. It\u2019s oh my goodness now. Like how it\u2019s like understanding what the levers of power are. So far, we\u2019ve been talking about the levers of power that we have as individuals sitting on a board, but then there\u2019s what are the levers of power that PCORI has that NQF has? And how can we recognize what those levers of power are? And, in a way, has been an advocate and an activist. Maybe I\u2019m oriented to what can I do? What\u2019s in the realm of possibility. And I think that\u2019s it\u2019s like if you\u2019re President of the United States, supposedly the most powerful person in the world, your power is limited. And when you sit in a role in a seat, you realize more the constraints you\u2019re operating in. So, I think when you\u2019re talking about mentorship of other people. Sometimes I find it challenging. Cause I hear from people, maybe a couple of times a month. Somebody will email me or call me, and what about this? And what about that? And why does the PCORI this or whatever? And I find myself trying to describe the environment and these levers of power. And I feel like this is learning now I\u2019m learning this, how do I communicate in that direction? Like, in a way, it\u2019s the hardest. Like I can talk to clinicians. I can talk to researchers. I can speak with measure developers. These are people. I find my constituency is sometimes the hardest. So, my constituency is sometimes the hardest for me cause in my mind. Oh my God, I\u2019m thinking they just don\u2019t understand how the sausage is made. And I don\u2019t want to. There\u2019s the. Do I have to think about how much I want to share about making the sausage? Because I\u2019m in a position where we\u2019re having these conversations. We\u2019re trying to figure stuff out. We\u2019re public. This is because most of our work is public. Still, it\u2019s hard. Sometimes I find it hard to suggest to people how they can. Here\u2019s a button you could push, right? Here\u2019s an approach that might work. On the other hand, I don\u2019t want to squash people\u2019s enthusiasm because people listened to me when I was raw. And they helped me mature and become more effective as an advocate as a participant. It\u2019s yeah. So, what\u2019s been your experience with that.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> I love the phrase making the sausage. It\u2019s been all over the news. Everybody is talking about it. And I think my first reactions are that people need to know that there is sausage. But that is even that. There is even a thing out in the world that people are doing this right. Like in the context of quality measurement, I didn\u2019t even know that. As a 24-year-old drug user going to Leapfrog to find out the highest quality care for my habits. I, that\u2019s just not that context. So, it\u2019s like people must be aware that there is sausage, and then they must be aware that people make it right. That there\u2019s a process by which this happens. And then they must be aware that those processes are very technical, and not only are they technical, but they\u2019re aimed at a very strange thing for our country right now, which is consensus. And I think for me, how the sausage is made is about teaching people a little more about what the expectations can be in that room. And I think, as a person with HIV, we were always taught from the moment I became an advocate. You are in charge. Nothing about us without us. Like you are number one. And when you sit in a room like that, that mindset. This is just not true. First, other patients in the room have just as much authority now to change that system as I do, but it\u2019s different. And so, one of the things that I\u2019ve learned about it is if people don\u2019t know what you\u2019re making or what you\u2019re doing, they go at what they know. And so, when I first got involved in boards and moved from organization to Board, I became clear about the distinction between mission, vision, and values and process and procedure. I\u2019m a sausage maker. I want to process and procedure. Like I write work plans. I write government grants. It\u2019s like, all those things are how I think the sausage is made. Because as a staff member in an organization, I may or may not have ever participated in a strategic planning process. I may not know why those values become so important because all I\u2019m receiving are the processes that have flowed from that mission, those vision in those values. And so I think what happens, at least for me, is the sausage that I try to explain to people is what we\u2019re making here? And why the integration of a value of something like equity has a thousand tributaries of possibility that come from that, because now we have to apply that value, and we can look at every decision and say, is this in our values? And so, to me, exposing levers are things like that. Before joining boards, I didn\u2019t think I understood why policy is written the way it is? We want it to be broad yet specific enough to serve its purpose. You learn all the things there, but I think communities what they see and what they experience is bad. Somebody doesn\u2019t call me back. There\u2019s no appointment available. I showed up, and the provider stigmatized or discriminated against me. So we\u2019re immediately drawn out of value and into its mechanics because that\u2019s our experience. And so, for me, you\u2019ve got to refocus people around that and then align them to this idea that you are going to have people in that room that disagree with you. And they will like you as a human being, right. And that communities, at least I\u2019ll speak for the community of people with HIV. We\u2019ve been pitted against each other, right? Throughout history, we\u2019ve seen white and black people, gay and trans folks, right? Like all these different ways, society has the marginalized fight. And so, when you come to that table, you\u2019ve got a fighting spirit already. And unfortunately, sometimes you think you\u2019ve got to fight even the people in your community. You get to a table where those people aren\u2019t even in your community. Now, I want you to know what happened to me because I know you\u2019re important. Still, suppose I don\u2019t know why you\u2019re important or your levers of power. In that case, all I\u2019m doing is likely telling a doctor a story they already know, which probably already horrified them because they heard it happened from another colleague. And they may have even had the positional authority to have gotten rid of people that do that stuff. They know that, but we don\u2019t know that they know that. And so that to me again, what do you get to do? If I were going to take a clinician into like my old street world, I would give them some background information because I don\u2019t want them to be uncomfortable in that environment. Still, I also don\u2019t want them to do anything that will be stupid in that environment and be disrespectful to everybody else. So, for me, I meet people where they are, whether you\u2019re a patient or a doctor. I think we should speak in whatever language is appropriate for you. Patient, doctor, I don\u2019t care. I can learn the nuances of your language. If that means we\u2019ve got this bridge. To me, that\u2019s the sausage. And so, if we don\u2019t, yeah,<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> I like what you\u2019re saying about the values because it\u2019s saying that we\u2019re going to use organic stuff in our sausage. That\u2019s what a board does. A board says we have values.<\/p>\n What should we have talked about that we haven\u2019t?<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> No. I think it would be that what. The only thing I would add is that I carry so much information back when I sit on these boards and the access that I get to how decisions are made, why they\u2019re made the way they are, and the processes that produce them. So much of my job is to turn around and help everybody else understand that. I think that there\u2019s a critical lack of transparency, or something is missing in the communication and dissemination of it. That most people in this country are not aware of the, I think, amazing effort that people undertake every day to try to make this system better. And to try and do this. I could tell everybody I know, but I\u2019m one person in this country. I see a lot of people, but I don\u2019t know everybody. And so, something is missing in the mechanics of what we do because patients don\u2019t understand it on the regular. People in communities don\u2019t know how to get involved. And that to me, a lack of transparency, and I think it was like, what, 2007, there was like, great article, Don Berwick was like, oh, transparency is critical. What did I think the line was the most important attribute of a culture of safety? So, I think what we have to think about is our processes of consensus transparent. I think they are transparent. I just don\u2019t know if they\u2019re made accessible. Maybe that\u2019s what I want to say. You have transparency, but it\u2019s not accessible to everyone.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> I hear you. I would add to that. This is not just me, but I think what PCORI has done excellent is the science and the process of laypeople engagement, patients and caregivers being engaged, partnering, and inclusion. They\u2019re stellar. They\u2019re a guiding light. They\u2019re leading the pack. We still haven\u2019t done well when the learning from research gets implemented. And our focus has been on the health systems and clinicians\u2019 implementing. And I think we\u2019re just opening our eyes to people who are the ones who implement this stuff because it\u2019s about their lives. And how do you do that? If we think that health systems and clinicians are diverse, it\u2019s so homogenous when you compare it to all people with high blood pressure or disabilities. So, you know, it\u2019s a bit of dissemination, but it\u2019s more about dissemination that leads to action.<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> Yeah. And just to make sure, I hate it when I make statements that shade all of healthcare. So, I want to make it a macro level, which is, I think, a problem with how the American government seeks feedback from the communities. And the concept of public comment. All these ways, these mechanisms that we have. They are passive mechanisms, right? They require that people know that they\u2019re there and take action to access and make the feedback. And trust that feedback is incorporated, right? There are a lot of steps there. And right now, the people I know are busy. They\u2019ve got kids who weren\u2019t in school but now have to catch up. They lost family members. They switched jobs. The last thing people need is to have a feedback process with so many hurdles. And I don\u2019t think it\u2019s saying you got mail every American is surveyed. I\u2019ve got a whole community of people willing to talk, and I\u2019m unsure where I put them.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> Oh, that\u2019s a great note to end on. This is great. I\u2019m glad we met. I have the feeling there\u2019s more here, and I think we have colleagues who are on national boards, different national boards in the healthcare world. And I think it would be it might be good to find them and periodically think about how we do this work and support each other in doing this work. And here is where some of the synergies are. Obviously, for me, I\u2019m involved with NQF. I just became a member. Now that I can afford it, now can be a member for a hundred dollars. It used to be a thousand. And yeah. So, I\u2019m glad you are where you are. We need you. Thank you. We will talk to you again<\/p>\n Adam Thompson:<\/strong> For sure. And I agree with you. I think bringing communities of people trying to achieve similar goals is at least as I was raised the American way.<\/p>\n Health Hats:<\/strong> All right. Take care, man. Awesome. Have a great day. Okay, bye.<\/p>\n<\/a>Introducing Adam Thompson<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Patient-caregiver advocates on national Boards of Directors<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Activist, Advocate, Conduit, Leader<\/h3>\n
<\/a>The Ryan White HIV\/AIDS Program<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Pulling the curtain back. Feeling our oats.<\/h3>\n
<\/a>The right place to make a difference and re-charge<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Learn, coach, mentor<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Listen, reveal, shout<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Levers of power. Drunk the Kool-Aid. Now what?<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Transparency. The sausage gets made.<\/h3>\n
<\/a>More on conduits<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Engage, dissemination, act<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Is seeking public comment enough?<\/h3>\n
<\/a>Reflection<\/h3>\n