Peer Review and Reputation Systems: A Discussion
Can we trust traditional peer review? If it’s broken, how might we fix it? These questions are put to a panel of experts in this Journal of Participatory Medicine podcast. The spirited discussion accompanies 2 articles on the subject in JPM’s inaugural issue: ...Reputation Systems: A New Vision for Publishing and Peer Review
Warning: Undefined variable $silent in /home/pmed/public_html/wp-content/plugins/footnotes-for-wordpress/wp-footnotes.php on line 156
Warning: Undefined variable $silent in /home/pmed/public_html/wp-content/plugins/footnotes-for-wordpress/wp-footnotes.php on line 156
Warning: Undefined variable $silent in /home/pmed/public_html/wp-content/plugins/footnotes-for-wordpress/wp-footnotes.php on line 156
Warning: Undefined variable $silent in /home/pmed/public_html/wp-content/plugins/footnotes-for-wordpress/wp-footnotes.php on line 156
Warning: Undefined variable $silent in /home/pmed/public_html/wp-content/plugins/footnotes-for-wordpress/wp-footnotes.php on line 156
Warning: Undefined variable $silent in /home/pmed/public_html/wp-content/plugins/footnotes-for-wordpress/wp-footnotes.php on line 156
Abstract Summary: Peer review as we know it today is broken. A better way may be to create an online reputation system to rate the quality of an author, editor, or reviewer’s online contributions on the Internet, and apply such a system to pre- and open...