Amy Tenderich weighs in on the name debate: patient vs. consumer. Almost anything is better than cyberchondriac or medical googler, but e-patient is still my favorite.
Please consider supporting the Society by joining us today! Thank you.
Recent Posts
Exciting 15th Anniversary Project and Opportunity for Member EngagementAugust 7, 2024
Leveraging Personalized Technology to Motivate Behavior ChangeMay 6, 2024
Technology, Health Equity, and Participatory Medicine in the Care Management of Sickle Cell PatientsApril 26, 2024
Driving Transformation: Change Management Strategies for Integrating Participatory Medicine in HealthcareApril 6, 2024
The Challenge for Medicare Part D Patients: Inability to Utilize Pharmaceutical Programs to Reduce Medication CostsMarch 29, 2024
I loathe the word “consumer” — as if we use up healthcare. “Patient” isn’t much better, though it goes nicely with “waiting room”. I personally lobbied for “Fergusons”, but Tom put his foot down on that one.
How about “Health Activist”? That was a suggestion from Marie Connelly over on DiabetesMine.com. I also like Jane Sarasohn-Kahn’s suggestion of “citizen.”
Seems like each term
Seems like each term has pro’s and con’s. The reality is that we ARE acting like health consumers, but the term sure is cold and doesn’t embrace the elements of being a good, or savvy consumer. e-patient much better at that I think. Health Activist makes me think of people marching on Washington–which although probably not a bad idea–not the right term for everyday actions.
Will be nice when “patient” itself embodies all that we want e-patient to mean.