David Eddy did nothing to reassure Kent Bottles about evidence-based guidelines in his recent keynote, saying essentially: “The problem is that we don’t know what we are doing” (!!)
Recent Posts
Trust is Complicated: Person-First Safe Living in a Pandemic Part 3March 1, 2021
We’re Looking for an Executive Director to Join the SocietyJanuary 26, 2021
Power of People. Pause and Trust. Lynne BeckerJanuary 12, 2021- Marketing & Communications Rockstars Wanted!January 10, 2021
Person-First Safe Living in a Pandemic: Part 2: Finding GuidanceDecember 21, 2020
Dr. Eddy did say that quotation in the BusinessWeek article referenced in the original blog post. In the Reinertsen Lecture he did a masterful job of showing how today’s evidence-based guidelines are better than no guidelines at all. However, he did point out that today’s evidence-based guidelines do have limitations. For example, many patients have multiple diseases, the need for sharp cut-offs in guidelines do result in the need for clinical judgment, and the need for shared decision-making between patient and provider. Dr. Eddy did reassure me that computer-based simulation may be a way to move evidence-based medicine forward from today’s single disease guidelines. I would refer readers to the comment by Al Burgener in the original ICSI blog: we need Informed Judgment