This is an unusual contribution in our series Why I Joined. As we’ve observed (August 2008, February 2009, February 2011) that language can be important in social movements, because as words change their meaning, messages can get crossed, and what a speaker meant may not be what others hear.
In the story presented here, the language of change almost scared someone away who’s definitely aligned with our Society’s mission. But all ended well, because the meaning trumped the words. Personally, I don’t agree with all the aspects that Jackie heard – but we sure welcome the dialog! Let’s discuss in the comments.
Want to submit a guest post? See our guidelines.
Why I Joined The Society for Participatory Medicine
I was initially ambivalent about joining the Society for Participatory Medicine, for a couple of reasons. First, I will confess to being one of those who can get hung up on semantics. I don’t call myself an e-patient or an empowered patient. This perspective may have something to do with coming of age in the ‘70s. I don’t care to call myself a feminist, although I very much believe in women’s rights. I realized the same thing applies here. When I read about the Society’s mission and goals, I realized it’s something I believe in, no matter what I call myself.
The second reason I hesitated has to do with my frame of reference. I think people who identify themselves as e-patients are sometimes driven by a bad experience. My experience has only been positive. When I was diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ, I had no idea I was about to get a full-time, front-row seat to the medical profession. I went from seeing my family doctor once or twice a year to having a stable of four doctors (also including my general surgeon, plastic surgeon and oncologist) and seeing one or more of them once or twice a week for several months. Not once was I treated like anything less than a full partner in my treatment plan or my care.
I have to admit the way I was treated is something I took for granted until I started hearing from other women about their experiences, from not being told about their reconstructive choices, to having their pain during a procedure discounted, to having the equivalent of a “drive by” when a medical professional broke the news they had breast cancer. My wish would for be everyone to have the same experience I did and I’d like to do what I can to foster that.
I realize I may have led a charmed life and I can’t assume it will always be that way. Health care is undergoing a sea change and the way care is delivered going forward may not be anything like what we were used to. Patients need to be at the table for these discussions and we need to understand what’s at stake. If my surgeon, plastic surgeon, family doctor and oncologist had been in an ACO, would my access to them have suffered? Does evidence-based care equate to rationing? I haven’t got the first clue what the answers might be, or even what some of the questions are, but I think we need to work together as partners to find them. Bridging the gap between policy, which I think tends to look at groups, and the way we experience medicine as individuals, will be critical. I think the Society for Participatory Medicine will play an important role and I’m glad to be a part of it.
Society for Participatory Medicine member Jackie Fox is the author of From Zero to Mastectomy: What I Learned And You Need to Know About Stage 0 Breast Cancer (Amazon), which was named a Best Consumer Health Book 2010 by Library Journal. She blogs at http://secondbasedispatch.com and tweets as @jackiefox12.
We want grass roots participation. SPM membership is just $30 for individuals (scholarships on request) and starts at $250 for companies. Join here.