by Gilles Frydman | May 18, 2009
As the meme is now firmly accepted, I thought we ought to have another round of definition crowdsourcing. If you use the term please stop here for a minute and let us know what it means to you. I will summarize the responses and use the results to update the wikipedia...
by e-Patient Dave | Jul 28, 2008
Medpedia has gotten a lot of publicity in the past week. Considering that Wikipedia has disavowed* usefulness for patients, Medpedia sounds like a potentially great idea. * See Jon’s correction in Comments. –EPD But when I saw their home page it literally...
by John M. Grohol, Psy.D. | Apr 19, 2008
I don’t know of a living soul who views Wikipedia as any type of authoritative resource. Why? Because no single person takes responsibility for any article’s content or quality. Some articles are heavily and well-edited, while others are much less so. At...
by Susannah Fox | Jun 5, 2007
Read this quote and think about which industry is being admonished: “We cannot, however, continue to reject Wikipedia because we aren’t comfortable with the wiki process itself… To be quite frank, continually bad-mouthing Wikipedia to the very people who...
Introducing the CHAMP Principal Investigator: Cait DesRoches (Part 2)April 1, 2026
Everylife Foundation Community Congress Annual Meeting HighlightsJanuary 19, 2026
Collaboration is the Best Medicine: Patient-Centered Collaboration Grounded in Caritas®December 16, 2025
Collaboration is the Best Medicine: It’s the Heart of CaregivingNovember 7, 2025
Recent Comments